Gulnaz Takauova
Links:
Fordham, Benjamin. 2001. "Military Interests and Civilian Politics: The influence of the civil-military "Gap" on peacetime military policy." In Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, by Richard H.Kohn Peter D.Feaver. MIT press.
On Friday, January 27, President Donald Trump,
have signed an executive draft order what he called
“The great rebuilding of the Armed Forces” aiming to sufficiently
increase the military army size it’s and funding.
The executive draft charged the Secretary of
Defense, Jim Mattis to conduct what is called a “Readiness Review”. For 30 days the Defense Secretary is required
to re-examine the US national strategy and provide a plan to bolster the
military. This includes the plan for the future training of soldiers,
modernization of weaponry, equipment and infrastructure. In addition, the order
was mandating the increased military funding and increased amount of troops in
the Army. According to the Washington Post, these are the necessary steps to prepare
the United States for the war against the ISIS.
According to the various speeches during his
presidential campaign, Trump aims to increase the number of soldiers to
540,000, Navy fleet to 350 ships, Air Force fighters to 1,200 and also the
number of Marine Corps infantry battalions to 36. In contrast, during the
Barack Obama’s leadership, the Army shrunk to the smallest number since before
the World War II. At the end of November
2013 the Army number reached 470,465 soldiers and Obama wanted to continue this
trend until the Army would reach 450,000 soldiers in 2018.
However, this is not the first case when the US
military spending had been fluctuating under the leadership of different
Presidents. The military spending is one aspect of the US budget that has been
changing throughout all of its
history. It rose under Presidents Raegan and Bush but has been substantially
cut under Presidents Clinton and Obama. And now the military spending again is
being raised by the President Donald Trump. What can be accounted for these
changes?
According to the Feaver
and Kohn, authors of the book “Soldiers and the State”, the partisanship and
ideology play a crucial role in shaping the preferences on military spending.
The authors argue that since 1960s Republicans became highly supportive of
military spending while the Democrats’
opinion towards the defense spending generally tend to unite into opposition.
This trend is seen nowadays as under the Democrat President Barack Obama the US
defense spending was substantially cut and under Republican President Donald
Trump it was dramatically increased.
No comments:
Post a Comment